A Joint Venture Agreement and Central Park Medical Group Essay

A Joint Venture Agreement and Central Park Medical concourse - Essay ExampleThis is essentially what I am existence asked to do I am being asked to pay monthly bonuses to the Central Park Medical aggroup in order to form a business arrangement in which patients of the Central Park Medical Group are sent to my establishment, sunset Community Hospital. In addition, it seems that the room, as well as myself, are fully aware of the fact that 60% of the Central Park Medical Group patients are covered by government health coverage. This is patently why the board is eager to seal this deal with the medical examination throng.The fact that this is a sound out approximate agreement makes some of the facts a bit subject to interpretation as the Board of Medical Directors has use accepted rules depending on the state. Anti-kickback statutes specifically state that income that may surface from joint venture activities must be compensation for services rendered. The bonuses given to ph ysicians in the joint venture agreement between my organization and the medical group in question is very clearly not for any purpose but a referral incentive.The Medicare and Medicaid Protection Act of 1987 clearly states that the type of actions described by the board to me as the administrator would limit as a federal offense punishable with fines of up to $25,000 as well as other(a) possible sentencing. I absolutely would make this clear to the board, that the terms under which they would like to issue the joint venture agreement are not only unethical but also illegal and could get out in criminal prosecutions of not only board members but the members of the Central Park Medical group and myself. My suggestions would follow a more than legal and ethical approach. I would suggest to the board that first of all, individually and every board member refresh their reading on anti-kickback statutes and laws. I would remind the board that although certain allowances are made in t hese statutes, the terms which they have decided on regarding the medical group in question are specifically why the statutes are in place, to begin with. I would resubmit to the board a legal revision of the arrangement. It would include the merger between the Central Park Medical Group and the Sundown Community Hospital as integrity that promoted a helpful liaison to the patients, regardless of their amends type. This would under no circumstances include any type of monetary gain from Sundown to the medical group, in the form of bonuses or perks. By definition of a joint venture agreement, the compensation have by the medical group would be limited to shared profit as well as losses. This is simply the only legal and ethical way to enter into such an agreement under these circumstances. I would also stress to everyone involved that since we are dealing with a medical group that has made us aware of their 60% Medicare patients, that we as the Sundown Community Health Center shou ld be that much more concerned for the how the legality of this union appears. There should be careful measures taken to ensure that no one is receiving any type of kickback of any sort.I would also emphasize that since we are indeed a fellowship center, we should be focused on the needs and best interest of the community and not our personal gains from the members of that community. In addition, I would remind everyone involved of the case of Feldstein M.D. vs Nash Community Health Services Inc.